GUILD concerns of raising or keeping

I am going to say my piece short and sweet. I want smaller guild but all the members. I don't need 60 in one guild and I don't need a 30 max. It would be nice to have all the members in one guild so it is easier to keep track of.

On the downside this does pull members away from new guilds and i understand that.

Now the poll I wish to get correct and precise answers so DO NOT START A FLAME WAR AGAINST ANYONE OR ANY GUILD. Those post will be removed swiftly.

Davzee House No troll memes or Hazemberg lol.

No trolls just a serious understanding of everyones views.

 

Sorry koolaid,

I just have to ask a few questions with regard to the 1st choice and 4th choice.

Option 1: If all the franchise guild is combine under one guild, how many leaders will there be? Since some of the theses franchise leader bought their own guild stone. and what is the max members limit for a consolidated guild?

Option 4: If limit the members to 30, does it mean all the franchise guild combine to one guild still or all the franchise guild gets 30 members limit each?

Had to ask before i give my vote...

 

Little brother no need to be sorry I appreciate you asking before you pick. I wrote the thread in like 2 mins at a crap computer at work that i wasn't supposed to use


Option 1 Concerning this topic.Then Leader Keep only 1 spot. If its not alot of trouble add a new status named Field Marshall and give them the current ability's as the co leaders. The coleaders up the amount you can have to 6 and give them the ability to level the guild up.

Current abilitys for leader is everything, Coleaders can do everything but buy guild buffs and level the guild. warengineers can invite people into the guild I believe and scheduled a war between guilds, and then the members can join and play.

So by adding a new class and upping the coleaders we will have a happier assortment of players with cooler titles, better access and 30 players per guild.



Option 4. If the franchise guild has only 30 members in total then yes they could be combined into One guild Thus removing the headache for running multiple guilds. *Just to make sure i don't get on anyones badside I will use my own guild for a example.* Say for example Umbrella corp has 10 people in each guild, combine them all into one guild.

Also all guilds should be raised to be able to hold 30 members and the guilds like stars and umbrella corp that have 3 guilds should be able to hold 30 members per guild thus reducing the eyesore that is UC3 or Stars3 not that its a eyesore but you understand?


If there is need for more explanation just tell me where we aren't meeting up and I will do my best to answer you. I would be glad to do it.

 

I didn't word option 2 like i wanted but I see its been voted on already. Most Not all but most members join for the guild buffs not the fun of lvling a guild. Probably the better way to have put it was to say no because there is no point in doing this because people will only join the highest guild with every buff and take advantage of it.


I know full and well that the players do this anyway because when i started making the second guild people requested to be put in the one with all the buffs. People guild hop to the one that has the best perks* Not all people but some do*

I apologize guys and girls this is a really hard month for me so I can't put my words together like i want to.

 

Thanks for taking the time to explain koolaid.

Voted.

 

eh just noticed.I want to make limit to 30 members defo not to 60.
1st option for which I voted doesn't show the exact number of members.

 

I half assed this thread so much sorry everyone for all the confusion. I think my original thought was 40 members by combining and having only 1 guild.